Following on from the earlier post with the snippet about generating GUIDs -- and covering a good chunk of what's been occupying me since...
I have ended up in charge of the build system for the current project at work. This started out with one framework that used a number of custom projects inside a solution to perform unit test, FxCop and coverage analysis, with a lot of magic happening in post-build steps, including direct calls to Wix command-line utilities. Another team had developed a better separated MSBuild-based system, which split out things like the analysis and installer building from the assembly-building solution. We can argue the merits of taking the unit tests out of every checking compile; but separating out the installer build does have a significant benefit in terms of cycle time for a recompilation.
Frankensteining the two together was an interesting task; and IronPython has been a valuable component of the mix. As I noted quite a while ago, the convenience of an
XCOPY install on a machine with a current .net installation (any build or dev machine), and the access to the full APIs makes for a powerful tool during a build -- it's not just the fact that you get better string manipulation than a batch file, or can easily spawn off a call to source control to get a synch-level value to stamp an assembly with.
In the current context, there are a number of components being built with a common architecture, so there are plenty of opportunities to DRY the system out.
- There are repetitive pieces of code (declaring concrete subtypes of shared base classes, to inject component specific information) which can be run by having a couple of .py files (just containing a single map initialization with common keys and component or project specific values) to define the files affected and the component-specific substitutions to make (including in some cases stable but component specific GUIDs, that can be keyed off the component specific names)
- The shared architecture makes the MSBuild .proj file just as valid for such
- Wix source files are just XML documents -- they can be generated programmatically from XML fragments, inspecting the solution output and filling in the appropriate entities.
- So are Wix project files (or any MSBuild project for that matter) -- a project to build a 64-bit installer can be derived from a 32-bit installer project by a similar set of XML manipulations.
Taking the latter as an example
Of course, assumes that the .wxs files have
Win64='$(var.X64)' attributes sprinkled appropriately.